I've been jeering at Washington, DC wannabe government types for not using version control for important documents. No wonder these are not the real coders.
But then some of them do, and when you get down to it, the NPYM Quakers do not, for their Faith & Practice. I've sort of crafted an identity stretched around such a framework and should backpedal from jeering to producing hearty exhortations.
We both should get serious (we in government, we Friends).
Someone with a commit bit is not necessarily hogging the limelight. One commits on behalf of others after reviewing and passing their code. You're a conduit into a shared asset of considerable value.
Needing to go back a branch because the stuff you've committed actually sucks is the reason version control exists, but do that too often and you might lose that commit bit. Stop leading us down blind allies. We'll even forgive a few, but followers have their limits, before their leaders become scapegoats.
Wikipedia is so interesting and would take lifetimes to really study. The discussions that go on over small editorial changes, the feuds. Sometimes you go to the page less for the end result than for the discussion behind the scenes.
Our Faith & Practice would be that much richer with such a background. So would government documents, that could find the time to mature (some official documents are written hurriedly, under the pressure of events).
I'm not just talking from inexperience about matters of which I know naught. I've done a Wikipedia page in concert with others, the one on Synergetics (Fuller's version).
Here's a snap shot that pretty much comprises my total contribution.
If you check the discussion tab, you'll see others played a big role. I was not the originator of the page, it had simply long remained dormant.
The process of co-creation was reminiscent of giving birth in the sense that there was some pain and strife, as well as risk.
Although "version control" may sound cold and "engineery" it's actually more humane to preserve these timelines that register the passions of those who provided content, or experienced their content getting blocked.
Movie making is like this too, inevitably, as ultimately life collapses to what's so versus what it might have been. Even those who work solo must make their compromises (to work solo is also a cost, a freedom lost or not chosen).